IRS disputes a New York company’s classification of its income

a5.jpg
The classification of profits as ordinary income or capital gains can be a controversial issue, even for professional securities and financial professionals. Recently, Renaissance Technologies, a New York hedge fund, found itself embroiled in tax controversy with officials from the Internal Revenue Service over this very issue.

There is a potential profit motive behind the distinction, of course. Capital gains are taxed in a lower tax back. If the event resulted in lost income, characterizing that downfall as a capital loss may also have tax benefits. In addition, a capital loss might have carryback potential to the three taxable years before the event or carryover to the five years following the loss year.

Yet the issue can also affect — and confuse — individual taxpayers. Investment gains or losses usually qualify as capital gains or losses. However, taxpayers may wonder how to characterize other sources of income, such as income from a rental property or sole proprietorship.

The Internal Revenue Code has definitions for many different sources of income, but often there are conditions that must be present before a certain type of income or loss can be characterized under its corresponding statutory definition. If an audit results in a dispute over the characterization of certain income, a tax attorney might prove to be a valuable resource.

Historically, the rate of audits has been low. However, audit rates have risen by more than 25% in recent years, and that trend may continue as the federal government looks for more revenue sources and IRS officials try to ride out recent media accusations of biased audit investigations.

Contact Information